Peer-reviewed science and research behind our products and techniques. 

Don't just take our word for the effectiveness of our techniques and protocols.  Take in the background and outcomes for yourself from top articles and publications.

Go Back
  • Dislocation resistance of ProRoot Endo Sealer, a calcium silicate-based root canal sealer, from radicular dentine.

    Huffman BP, Mai S, Pinna L, Weller RN, Primus CM, Gutmann JL, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Int Endod J. 2009 Jan;42(1):34-46.

    To examine the dislocation resistance of three root canal sealers from radicular dentine with and without immersion in a simulated body fluid (SBF), using a modified push-out test design that produced simulated canal spaces of uniform dimensions under identical cleaning and shaping conditions. Full abstract.

  • Comparison of defects in ProFile and ProTaper systems after clinical use.

    Shen Y, Cheung GS, Bian Z, Peng B. J Endod. 2006 Jan;32(1):61-5.

    The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence and mode of instrument separation of the two nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary systems that were used according to a predefined schedule of clinical use by the same group of operators.  The results of this study indicated that while ProTaper was more likely to separate without warning, ProFile tended to exhibit unwinding of flutes more frequently. Full abstract.

  • In vitro apical leakage of system B compared with other filling techniques.

    Pommel L, Camps J.  J Endod. 2001 Jul;27(7):449-51.

    A fluid filtration system was used to compare the apical microleakage of roots filled with the system B (Analytic Technology), single-cone technique, lateral condensation, vertical condensation, and Thermafil (Caulk-Dentsply). Full abstract.